linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add the --for-tree argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3251b73cce77964413e01d4f5361de48942e98ae.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Oct 2022 20:48:10 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add the --for-tree argument

On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 19:56 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 17:39:53 PDT (-0700), joe@...ches.com wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 14:57 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > I recently wanted to look up the maintainers for each tree path via a
> > > script, and I couldn't find a better way to do that than poking
> > > get_maintainer.pl to add a new argument.  This lets folks run something
> > > like
> > > 
> > >     $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --for-tree git://github.com/kvm-riscv/linux.git
> > >     Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org> (maintainer:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv))
> > >     kvm@...r.kernel.org (maintainer:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv))
> > >     kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org (maintainer:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv))
> > >     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org (maintainer:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv))
> > > 
> > > to find out who owns a tree.
> > 
> > I'm not sure this is useful.
[]
> Generally sound like you 
> don't want this one so I'm going to punt on fixing these for now, I 
> don't care all that much about having this merged.
> 
> LMK if you want a v2, though.

I think it's not necessary.

Thanks,  Joe