linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221014071914.227134-2-gshan@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:19:09 +0800
From:   Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To:     kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc:     kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, maz@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        oliver.upton@...ux.dev, seanjc@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com,
        maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com, ricarkol@...gle.com,
        zhenyzha@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Use data->nslots in prepare_vm()

In prepare_vm(), 'data->nslots' is assigned with 'max_mem_slots - 1'
at the beginning, meaning they are interchangeable.

Use 'data->nslots' isntead of 'max_mem_slots - 1'. With this, it
becomes easier to move the logic of probing number of slots into
upper layer in subsequent patches.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index 44995446d942..231cc8449c2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -280,14 +280,14 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
 	ucall_init(data->vm, NULL);
 
 	pr_info_v("Adding slots 1..%i, each slot with %"PRIu64" pages + %"PRIu64" extra pages last\n",
-		max_mem_slots - 1, data->pages_per_slot, rempages);
+		data->nslots, data->pages_per_slot, rempages);
 
 	clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tstart);
-	for (slot = 1, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < max_mem_slots; slot++) {
+	for (slot = 1, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot <= data->nslots; slot++) {
 		uint64_t npages;
 
 		npages = data->pages_per_slot;
-		if (slot == max_mem_slots - 1)
+		if (slot == data->nslots)
 			npages += rempages;
 
 		vm_userspace_mem_region_add(data->vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
 	}
 	*slot_runtime = timespec_elapsed(tstart);
 
-	for (slot = 0, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < max_mem_slots - 1; slot++) {
+	for (slot = 0, guest_addr = MEM_GPA; slot < data->nslots; slot++) {
 		uint64_t npages;
 		uint64_t gpa;
 
 		npages = data->pages_per_slot;
-		if (slot == max_mem_slots - 2)
+		if (slot == data->nslots - 1)
 			npages += rempages;
 
 		gpa = vm_phy_pages_alloc(data->vm, npages, guest_addr,
-- 
2.23.0