linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake support to pmc core driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5320210a-9f94-9971-aa63-c0f48df94def@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:00:02 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     markgross@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, irenic.rajneesh@...il.com,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] platform/x86/intel: pmc/core: Add Raptor Lake
 support to pmc core driver

Hi,

On 10/14/22 09:50, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 19. 09. 22, 13:41, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>> On 9/13/22 00:33, Gayatri Kammela wrote:
>>> Add Raptor Lake client parts (both RPL and RPL_S) support to pmc core
>>> driver. Raptor Lake client parts reuse all the Alder Lake PCH IPs.
>>>
>>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com>
>>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: David Box <david.e.box@...el.com>
>>> Acked-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <irenic.rajneesh@...il.com>
>>> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kammela@...ux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> 1) Added a dependency patch- ea902bcc1943f7539200ec464de3f54335588774 :
>>>   "x86/cpu: Add new Raptor Lake CPU model number".
>>> 2) Rebased the above patch on v6.0-rc1 with "Acked-by" from Hans and
>>>   Rajneesh.
>>
>> I still cannot take this, since patch 1/2 is *already merged* through
>> another tree, so me cherry-picking it leads to potential conflicts.
>>
>> As I have already explained twice you need to submit this upstream
>> throuh the same tree which has the original merge of patch 1/2.
> 
> Hi, friendly ping: has this ever happened, Gayatri?

If not, 6.1-rc1 will be out soon. If this gets resend after 6.1-rc1
is out I can take it and I can add it to 6.1-rc# as a fix in my
next pull-req to Linus.

Regards,

Hans