linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Stop adding speculative Intel GP PMCs that don't exist yet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:54:13 +0800
From:   Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: x86/pmu: Stop adding speculative Intel GP
 PMCs that don't exist yet

On 8/10/2022 3:38 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Does this need Cc:stable@...r.kernel.org?  Or is this benign enough that we don't
> care?

Considering stable kernel may access IA32_OVERCLOCKING_STATUS as well,
cc stable list helps to remove the illusion of pmu msr scope for stable tree 
maintainers.

> 
> No need for a v4, the above nits can be handled when applying.

Thanks, so kind of you.

> 
>> Suggested-by: Jim Mattson<jmattson@...gle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Like Xu<likexu@...cent.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson<jmattson@...gle.com>
>> ---
> In the future, please provide a cover letter even for trivial series, it helps
> (me at least) mentally organize patches.

Roger that.

> 
> Thanks!
>