[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb513ce8-3c2a-6b67-7abe-1d5671b682d0@traphandler.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:17:06 +0200
From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
CC: <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <pavel@....cz>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<sven.schwermer@...ruptive-technologies.com>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
<jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] devres: provide devm_krealloc_array()
On 07/10/2022 18:18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> {
>> return devm_kmalloc_array(dev, n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO);
>> }
> Missed blank line?
There is no blank line after the definitions of devm_kzalloc(),
devm_kmalloc_array() and devm_kcalloc() defined just above.
>
>> +static inline void *devm_krealloc_array(struct device *dev,
>> + void *p,
>> + size_t new_n,
>> + size_t new_size,
>> + gfp_t flags)
>> +{
>> + size_t bytes;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(new_n, new_size, &bytes)))
>> + return NULL;
> I'm not sure it is what we want, but I have read the man realloc and found this:
>
> ... reallocarray() fails safely in the case where the multiplication
> would overflow. If such an overflow occurs, reallocarray() returns NULL,
> sets errno to ENOMEM, and leaves the original block of memory
> unchanged.
>
> So, perhaps you can add that this behaviour mimics reallocarray()?
except for the errno part, that is what is does. I don't think we should
use ERR_PTR in this case as the other allocation functions don't use it.
>
>> + return devm_krealloc(dev, p, bytes, flags);
>> +}
> ...
>
> All comments are minor, feel free to add
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists