lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221014135302.2109489-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:52:54 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        pmladek@...e.com, david@...hat.com, laoar.shao@...il.com,
        arnd@...db.de, cai.huoqing@...ux.dev
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 1/8] signal: break out of wait loops on kthread_stop()

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>

[ Upstream commit a7c01fa93aeb03ab76cd3cb2107990dd160498e6 ]

I was recently surprised to learn that msleep_interruptible(),
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(), and related functions
simply hung when I called kthread_stop() on kthreads using them. The
solution to fixing the case with msleep_interruptible() was more simply
to move to schedule_timeout_interruptible(). Why?

The reason is that msleep_interruptible(), and many functions just like
it, has a loop like this:

        while (timeout && !signal_pending(current))
                timeout = schedule_timeout_interruptible(timeout);

The call to kthread_stop() woke up the thread, so schedule_timeout_
interruptible() returned early, but because signal_pending() returned
true, it went back into another timeout, which was never woken up.

This wait loop pattern is common to various pieces of code, and I
suspect that the subtle misuse in a kthread that caused a deadlock in
the code I looked at last week is also found elsewhere.

So this commit causes signal_pending() to return true when
kthread_stop() is called, by setting TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL.

The same also probably applies to the similar kthread_park()
functionality, but that can be addressed later, as its semantics are
slightly different.

Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220627120020.608117-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220627145716.641185-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
v3: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220628161441.892925-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
v4: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220711202136.64458-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
v5: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220711232123.136330-1-Jason@zx2c4.com
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/kthread.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 5b37a8567168..c8ca1007e2dd 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -644,6 +644,7 @@ int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k)
 	kthread = to_kthread(k);
 	set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &kthread->flags);
 	kthread_unpark(k);
+	set_tsk_thread_flag(k, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL);
 	wake_up_process(k);
 	wait_for_completion(&kthread->exited);
 	ret = k->exit_code;
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ