lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0mD0LcNvu+QTlQ9@magnolia>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 08:44:16 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To:     Hrutvik Kanabar <hrkanabar@...il.com>
Cc:     Hrutvik Kanabar <hrutvik@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/7] fs/xfs: support `DISABLE_FS_CSUM_VERIFICATION`
 config option

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:48:35AM +0000, Hrutvik Kanabar wrote:
> From: Hrutvik Kanabar <hrutvik@...gle.com>
> 
> When `DISABLE_FS_CSUM_VERIFICATION` is enabled, return truthy value for
> `xfs_verify_cksum`, which is the key function implementing checksum
> verification for XFS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hrutvik Kanabar <hrutvik@...gle.com>

NAK, we're not going to break XFS for the sake of automated fuzz tools.

You'll have to adapt your fuzzing tools to rewrite the block header
checksums, like the existing xfs fuzz testing framework does.  See
the xfs_db 'fuzz -d' command and the relevant fstests.

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h
> index 999a290cfd72..ba55b1afa382 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_cksum.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,10 @@ xfs_verify_cksum(char *buffer, size_t length, unsigned long cksum_offset)
>  {
>  	uint32_t crc = xfs_start_cksum_safe(buffer, length, cksum_offset);
>  
> -	return *(__le32 *)(buffer + cksum_offset) == xfs_end_cksum(crc);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DISABLE_FS_CSUM_VERIFICATION))
> +		return 1;
> +	else
> +		return *(__le32 *)(buffer + cksum_offset) == xfs_end_cksum(crc);
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* _XFS_CKSUM_H */
> -- 
> 2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ