linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: add samsung,starqltechn board based on sdm845 chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 12:10:51 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: add samsung,starqltechn board
 based on sdm845 chip

On 14/10/2022 07:01, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
> чт, 13 окт. 2022 г. в 16:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:
>>
>> On 12/10/2022 14:54, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
>>> Add samsung,starqltechn board (Samsung Galaxy S9) binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes for v2,v3: none
>>
>> Where is v2 and v3 of this?
> I've been told it's easier for maintainers to resend all patch series,
> even if only 1 patch from the series requires change. So I decided to
> keep versions equal in all patches, to clearly indicate those patches
> are from the same series. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.

This is okay, but you wrote here there was a v1 and v2, and you changed
nothing against it. If there was v1 and v2, we would ack it, I think.

Or this changelog is for some other patch? Not for this one?

Best regards,
Krzysztof