[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0mOaLL6wO2Mp7dy@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:29:28 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: john.p.donnelly@...cle.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@...group.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
"samasth.norway.ananda" <samasth.norway.ananda@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: kdump: Function supplement and performance
optimization
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 06:46:35PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 10/06/22 at 09:55am, john.p.donnelly@...cle.com wrote:
> > What is the progress of this series ?
> >
> > Without this patch set we are seeing larger crashkernel=896M failures on
> > Arm with Linux-6.0.rc7. This larger value is needed for
> > iSCSI booted systems with certain network adapters.
>
> This change is located in arch/arm64 folder, I have pinged arm64
> maintainer to consider merging this patchset. Not sure if they are
> still thinking, or ignore this.
>
> Hi Catalin, Will,
>
> Ping again!
>
> Do you have plan to accept this patchset? It's very important for
> crashkernel setting on arm64 with a simple and default syntax.
I'll look at it once the merging window closes. I saw discussions on
this thread and I ignored it until you all agreed ;).
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists