linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 25/27] x86: enable initial Rust support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y0mbcEuR7GhJncSE@Boquns-Mac-mini.local>
Date:   Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:25:04 -0700
From:   Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
        Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 25/27] x86: enable initial Rust support

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 07:23:18PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:04 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Right; so where does that leave us? Are we going to force disable rust
> > when kCFI is selected ?
> 
> Constraining it via `depends on !...` or similar as needed for the
> moment is fine, we have a few others too.
> 

Right, and Peter, we actually need your help to figure out which configs
are related ;-)

Regards,
Boqun

> Cheers,
> Miguel