[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0rVb1+PEai6vUWy@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 17:44:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Connor O'Brien <connoro@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Reviving the Proxy Execution Series
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 09:44:50PM +0000, Connor O'Brien wrote:
> Proxy execution has been discussed over the past few years at several
> conferences[3][4][5], but (as far as I'm aware) patches implementing the
> concept have not been discussed on the list since Juri Lelli's RFC in
> 2018.[6] This series is an updated version of that patchset, seeking to
> incorporate subsequent work by Juri[7], Valentin Schneider[8] and Peter
> Zijlstra along with some new fixes.
I actually did a forward port at some point after core-scheduling and
had a sort-of working version -- although I do remember it being an even
bigger pain in the arse than normal.
I think I handed those patches to Joel at some point...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists