[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c69e005d-7088-c4cd-f584-c4cf5385cdcc@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 11:58:41 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
ming.lei@...hat.com, hare@...e.de, john.garry@...wei.com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-mq: fix null pointer dereference in
blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping()
Hi, Jens!
在 2022/10/11 22:22, Yu Kuai 写道:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> Our syzkaller report a null pointer dereference, root cause is
> following:
>
> __blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs
> set->tags[hctx_idx] = blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs
> blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs
> blk_mq_alloc_rqs
> // failed due to oom
> alloc_pages_node
> // set->tags[hctx_idx] is still NULL
> blk_mq_free_rqs
> drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
> // null pointer dereference is triggered
> blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(drv_tags, ...)
>
> This is because commit 63064be150e4 ("blk-mq:
> Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()") merged the two steps:
>
> 1) set->tags[hctx_idx] = blk_mq_alloc_rq_map()
> 2) blk_mq_alloc_rqs(..., set->tags[hctx_idx])
>
> into one step:
>
> set->tags[hctx_idx] = blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()
>
> Since tags is not initialized yet in this case, fix the problem by
> checking if tags is NULL pointer in blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping().
>
> Fixes: 63064be150e4 ("blk-mq: Add blk_mq_alloc_map_and_rqs()")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - fix spelling mistakes
> - add review tag
>
> block/blk-mq.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Can you apply this patch?
Thanks,
Kuai
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 8070b6c10e8d..33292c01875d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3112,8 +3112,11 @@ static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags,
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - /* There is no need to clear a driver tags own mapping */
> - if (drv_tags == tags)
> + /*
> + * There is no need to clear mapping if driver tags is not initialized
> + * or the mapping belongs to the driver tags.
> + */
> + if (!drv_tags || drv_tags == tags)
> return;
>
> list_for_each_entry(page, &tags->page_list, lru) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists