[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221015110724.5c535807@xps-13>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 11:07:24 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: yexingchen116@...il.com
Cc: richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mtd: replace strcmp with sysfs_streq
Hi yexingchen116@...il.com,
yexingchen116@...il.com wrote on Sat, 8 Oct 2022 07:46:43 +0000:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with sysfs_streq().
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/parsers/cmdlinepart.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/parsers/cmdlinepart.c
> b/drivers/mtd/parsers/cmdlinepart.c
> index b34856def816..6a401e0b1b95 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/parsers/cmdlinepart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/parsers/cmdlinepart.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static struct mtd_partition * newpart(char *s,
> }
>
> /* if slc is found use emulated SLC mode on this partition*/
> - if (!strncmp(s, "slc", 3)) {
> + if (sysfs_streq(s, "slc")) {
I'm sorry but, why this would be a use for sysfs_streq? The point of
this helper is to consider "\n" null, which is not relevant here. Or do
I miss something?
> add_flags |= MTD_SLC_ON_MLC_EMULATION;
> s += 3;
> }
Thanks,
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists