linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 04/46] soc: mediatek: Let PMIC Wrapper and SCPSYS depend on OF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y0wZVNIAqZJmqoRJ@sashalap>
Date:   Sun, 16 Oct 2022 10:46:44 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Chenglin Xu <chenglin.xu@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.0 04/46] soc: mediatek: Let PMIC Wrapper and
 SCPSYS depend on OF

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:49:49AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>Hi Sasha,
>
>On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:49:32 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 2778caedb5667239823a29148dfc48b26a8b3c2a ]
>>
>> With the following configuration options:
>> CONFIG_OF is not set
>> CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP=y
>> CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS=y
>> we get the following build warnings:
>>
>>   CC      drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.o
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c:2138:34: warning: ‘of_pwrap_match_tbl’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c:1953:34: warning: ‘of_slave_match_tbl’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>>   CC      drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.o
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c:1084:34: warning: ‘of_scpsys_match_tbl’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
>> (...)
>
>This is warning only, pretty harmless, so I don't think this qualifies
>for stable kernel trees.

Ack, I can drop it.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha