[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221016171716.2817fad3@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:17:16 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Lazar <alazar@...rtmail.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] iio: max1241: simplify using
devm_regulator_get_enable()
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 22:58:45 +0300
Alexandru Lazar <alazar@...rtmail.com> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I don't have the hardware at hand (long story, lots of smoke), so all I
> can do for this patch at the moment is:
>
> Acked-by: Alexandru Lazar <alazar@...rtmail.com>
>
> That being said, IIRC the MAX1241 has no special requirements in this
> regard, so if other SPI devices work, this one ought to work as well. If
> anyone's concerned, I can test it, but probably not sooner than a week
> or so :-(.
>
> FWIW I really like this, the straightforward regulator boilerplate
> always felt a tad wrong.
>
> All the best,
> Alex
Now the dependencies are upstream... Applied to the togreg branch of
iio.git and pushed out as testing so that 0-day can play with it and
because I plan to rebase that tree on rc1 sometime shortly.
Jonathan
>
> On 8/19/2022 10:20 PM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > Drop open-coded pattern: 'devm_regulator_get(), regulator_enable(),
> > add_action_or_reset(regulator_disable)' and use the
> > devm_regulator_get_enable() and drop the pointer to the regulator.
> > This simplifies code and makes it less tempting to add manual control
> > for the regulator which is also controlled by devm.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> > v2 => v3:
> > New patch
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/max1241.c | 28 +++-------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max1241.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max1241.c
> > index a815ad1f6913..500bb09ab19b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max1241.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max1241.c
> > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ enum max1241_id {
> > struct max1241 {
> > struct spi_device *spi;
> > struct mutex lock;
> > - struct regulator *vdd;
> > struct regulator *vref;
> > struct gpio_desc *shutdown;
> >
> > @@ -110,17 +109,6 @@ static const struct iio_info max1241_info = {
> > .read_raw = max1241_read_raw,
> > };
> >
> > -static void max1241_disable_vdd_action(void *data)
> > -{
> > - struct max1241 *adc = data;
> > - struct device *dev = &adc->spi->dev;
> > - int err;
> > -
> > - err = regulator_disable(adc->vdd);
> > - if (err)
> > - dev_err(dev, "could not disable vdd regulator.\n");
> > -}
> > -
> > static void max1241_disable_vref_action(void *data)
> > {
> > struct max1241 *adc = data;
> > @@ -147,20 +135,10 @@ static int max1241_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > adc->spi = spi;
> > mutex_init(&adc->lock);
> >
> > - adc->vdd = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdd");
> > - if (IS_ERR(adc->vdd))
> > - return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(adc->vdd),
> > - "failed to get vdd regulator\n");
> > -
> > - ret = regulator_enable(adc->vdd);
> > + ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(dev, "vdd");
> > if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, max1241_disable_vdd_action, adc);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "could not set up vdd regulator cleanup action\n");
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > + "failed to get/enable vdd regulator\n");
> >
> > adc->vref = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vref");
> > if (IS_ERR(adc->vref))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists