lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 16 Oct 2022 19:52:48 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>, richard@....at,
        anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com
Cc:     linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: protect find_task_by_pid_ns() with rcu lock

On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 23:10 +0800, Dawei Li wrote:
> find_task_by_pid_ns() is safe if and only if it's under protection
> from rcu read lock, implements the protection.
> 
> base-commit: 193cb8372424184dde28088a4230a5fed0afb0ad
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>
> ---
>  arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
> index 5026e7b9adfe..6b80e766ae80 100644
> --- a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
> @@ -683,7 +683,10 @@ void mconsole_stack(struct mc_request *req)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	rcu_read_lock();
>  	to = find_task_by_pid_ns(pid_requested, &init_pid_ns);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
>  	if ((to == NULL) || (pid_requested == 0)) {
>  		mconsole_reply(req, "Couldn't find that pid", 1, 0);
>  		return;

This can't be right - the 'to' pointer is used later in the code (not in
the existing context), so the protection, if needed, would have to
include the later "with_console()" call?

johannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ