[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh9o1x43Me0kRZAwN-DmZzUgJzUhA2_v+Uo0Aq04hB_=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:39:08 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.1-rc1
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:35 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> Build results:
> total: 152 pass: 152 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 490 pass: 420 fail: 70
Strange. You claim zero build failures, but then:
> Build failures
>
> Building riscv:defconfig ... failed
so I think your stats may be wrong somehow ;)
> mips, sparc64
> -------------
>
> All big endian mips tests fail to reset after boot. The problem is
> caused by commit 72a95859728a ("mfd: syscon: Remove repetition of the
> regmap_get_val_endian()").
Bah. I had already archived that whole thread as "sorted out", but
yeah, the revert clearly never made it to me for rc1.
But it should be in the regmap queue (Lee/Andy?), so it is hopefully
just a temporary thing.
In fact, it looks like all the failures have known fixes. So here's
hoping that your list will be a whole lot cleaner by rc2.
Knock wood.
Thanks,
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists