linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y02T98CUTxX5fbjE@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 18:42:15 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:39:24PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 08:35:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

> > Currently the board code assures that the property is always there for all
> > existing devices.

> Which board code is this?  The names of the new properties you're adding
> is really not at all idiomatic for ACPI and this is pretty old code so
> it's surprising that there's not existing systems that don't have this
> in their BIOSs.

Incidentally stuff like this is part of why you should write cover
letters for your serieses explaining what they're up to and/or provide
much more detailed information on what's going on in your patch
descriptions.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)