[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8fee658-5538-0f6c-c6fb-d3dd56099e76@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:58:50 +0800
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>, xiang@...nel.org,
chao@...nel.org
Cc: zhujia.zj@...edance.com, huyue2@...lpad.com,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] erofs: protect s_inodes with s_inode_list_lock
On 10/17/22 9:55 AM, Dawei Li wrote:
> s_inodes is superblock-specific resource, which should be
> protected by sb's specific lock s_inode_list_lock.
>
> v2: update the locking mechanisim to protect mutual-exclusive access
> both for s_inode_list_lock & erofs_fscache_domain_init_cookie(), as the
> reviewing comments from Jia Zhu.
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/TYCP286MB23237A9993E0FFCFE5C2BDBECA269@TYCP286MB2323.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM/
>
> base-commit: 8436c4a57bd147b0bd2943ab499bb8368981b9e1
>
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@...look.com>
Fixes: 7d41963759fe ("erofs: Support sharing cookies in the same domain")
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/erofs/fscache.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> index 998cd26a1b3b..fe05bc51f9f2 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> @@ -590,14 +590,17 @@ struct erofs_fscache *erofs_domain_register_cookie(struct super_block *sb,
> struct super_block *psb = erofs_pseudo_mnt->mnt_sb;
>
> mutex_lock(&erofs_domain_cookies_lock);
> + spin_lock(&psb->s_inode_list_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(inode, &psb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
> ctx = inode->i_private;
> if (!ctx || ctx->domain != domain || strcmp(ctx->name, name))
> continue;
> igrab(inode);
> + spin_unlock(&psb->s_inode_list_lock);
> mutex_unlock(&erofs_domain_cookies_lock);
> return ctx;
> }
> + spin_unlock(&psb->s_inode_list_lock);
> ctx = erofs_fscache_domain_init_cookie(sb, name, need_inode);
> mutex_unlock(&erofs_domain_cookies_lock);
> return ctx;
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists