[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1df01e31-9d31-e315-4906-d7f1ff9fb6d9@xen0n.name>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:49:33 +0800
From: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Add unaligned access support
On 2022/10/17 08:16, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Ruoyao,
>
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 11:05 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 2022-10-16 at 21:34 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>
>>> Loongson-2 series (Loongson-2K500, Loongson-2K1000)
>>
>> "2K1000LA"? "2K1000" is puzzling because of a name conflict with the
>> MIPS-based model.
> Technically this is correct, both MIPS-based and LoongArch-based
> Loongson-2K1000 have no hardware support.
Unfortunately, no, there is no "LoongArch-based" 2K1000. The Loongson
2K1000 is a MIPS processor, and will always be; the official model name
for the "LoongArch-based 2K1000" is 2K1000LA which is obviously distinct.
--
WANG "xen0n" Xuerui
Linux/LoongArch mailing list: https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists