[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e7e6b3d-1ba7-ca89-60a9-e63d9856e497@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:13:14 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>
Cc: Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: document rradc node
On 17/10/2022 14:51, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> Document the rradc node name, like adc-tm it's only used on a few
> platforms, so differentiate it from the standard adc node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20221016175757.1911016-1-caleb.connolly@linaro.org/
> Changes since v1:
> * Add a new node instead of using the adc@ node
> * no longer depend on Luca's patch
This is not what I proposed. The node name should stay adc as it is
generic. I propose to do it the same way as in
f4b632da13cf0ee39cdbd4ff08d1961ed50e3c14
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists