| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221017234750.454419-1-joshdon@google.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:47:50 -0700
From: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: async unthrottling for cfs bandwidth
CFS bandwidth currently distributes new runtime and unthrottles cfs_rq's
inline in an hrtimer callback. Runtime distribution is a per-cpu
operation, and unthrottling is a per-cgroup operation, since a tg walk
is required. On machines with a large number of cpus and large cgroup
hierarchies, this cpus*cgroups work can be too much to do in a single
hrtimer callback: since IRQ are disabled, hard lockups may easily occur.
Specifically, we've found this scalability issue on configurations with
256 cpus, O(1000) cgroups in the hierarchy being throttled, and high
memory bandwidth usage.
To fix this, we can instead unthrottle cfs_rq's asynchronously via a
CSD. Each cpu is responsible for unthrottling itself, thus sharding the
total work more fairly across the system, and avoiding hard lockups.
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
kernel/sched/sched.h | 9 ++++
2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e4a0b8bd941c..b4c2c5728292 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5318,10 +5318,73 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
resched_curr(rq);
}
-static void distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static void __cfsb_csd_unthrottle(void *arg)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = arg;
+ struct rq_flags rf;
+ struct cfs_rq *cursor, *tmp;
+
+ rq_lock(rq, &rf);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(cursor, tmp, &rq->cfsb_csd_list,
+ throttled_csd_list) {
+ struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cursor->tg);
+
+ list_del_init(&cursor->throttled_csd_list);
+ atomic_dec(&cfs_b->throttled_csd_count);
+
+ if (cfs_rq_throttled(cursor))
+ unthrottle_cfs_rq(cursor);
+ }
+
+ rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
+}
+
+static inline void __unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
+ struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b;
+
+ if (rq == this_rq()) {
+ unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Already enqueued */
+ if (SCHED_WARN_ON(!list_empty(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list)))
+ return;
+
+ cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
+
+ list_add_tail(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list, &rq->cfsb_csd_list);
+ atomic_inc(&cfs_b->throttled_csd_count);
+
+ smp_call_function_single_async(cpu_of(rq), &rq->cfsb_csd);
+}
+#else
+static inline void __unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+}
+#endif
+
+static void unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq_of(cfs_rq));
+
+ if (SCHED_WARN_ON(!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq) ||
+ cfs_rq->runtime_remaining <= 0))
+ return;
+
+ __unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(cfs_rq);
+}
+
+static bool distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
u64 runtime, remaining = 1;
+ bool throttled = false;
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq,
@@ -5329,11 +5392,20 @@ static void distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
struct rq_flags rf;
+ if (!remaining) {
+ throttled = true;
+ break;
+ }
+
rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
goto next;
- /* By the above check, this should never be true */
+ /* Already queued for async unthrottle */
+ if (!list_empty(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list))
+ goto next;
+
+ /* By the above checks, this should never be true */
SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0);
raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
@@ -5348,15 +5420,14 @@ static void distribute_cfs_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
/* we check whether we're throttled above */
if (cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0)
- unthrottle_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
+ unthrottle_cfs_rq_async(cfs_rq);
next:
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
-
- if (!remaining)
- break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return throttled;
}
/*
@@ -5401,10 +5472,8 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun, u
while (throttled && cfs_b->runtime > 0) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
/* we can't nest cfs_b->lock while distributing bandwidth */
- distribute_cfs_runtime(cfs_b);
+ throttled = distribute_cfs_runtime(cfs_b);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cfs_b->lock, flags);
-
- throttled = !list_empty(&cfs_b->throttled_cfs_rq);
}
/*
@@ -5675,12 +5744,16 @@ void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->slack_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
cfs_b->slack_timer.function = sched_cfs_slack_timer;
cfs_b->slack_started = false;
+ atomic_set(&cfs_b->throttled_csd_count, 0);
}
static void init_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
cfs_rq->runtime_enabled = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cfs_rq->throttled_list);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list);
+#endif
}
void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
@@ -5703,6 +5776,29 @@ static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->slack_timer);
+
+ /*
+ * It is possible that we still have some cfs_rq's pending on the CSD
+ * list, but this race is very rare. In order for this to occur, we must
+ * have raced with the last task leaving the group while there exist throttled
+ * cfs_rq(s), and the period_timer must have queued the CSD item but the remote
+ * cpu has not yet processed it. In this case, we can simply process all CSD
+ * work inline here.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(atomic_read(&cfs_b->throttled_csd_count) > 0)) {
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ __cfsb_csd_unthrottle(rq);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+ }
+
+ SCHED_WARN_ON(atomic_read(&cfs_b->throttled_csd_count) > 0);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -12237,6 +12333,11 @@ __init void init_sched_fair_class(void)
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(load_balance_mask, i), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&per_cpu(select_rq_mask, i), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(i));
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
+ INIT_CSD(&cpu_rq(i)->cfsb_csd, __cfsb_csd_unthrottle, cpu_rq(i));
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cpu_rq(i)->cfsb_csd_list);
+#endif
}
open_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ, run_rebalance_domains);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1644242ecd11..e6f505f8c351 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth {
struct hrtimer period_timer;
struct hrtimer slack_timer;
struct list_head throttled_cfs_rq;
+ atomic_t throttled_csd_count;
/* Statistics: */
int nr_periods;
@@ -645,6 +646,9 @@ struct cfs_rq {
int throttled;
int throttle_count;
struct list_head throttled_list;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+ struct list_head throttled_csd_list;
+#endif
#endif /* CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH */
#endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
};
@@ -1144,6 +1148,11 @@ struct rq {
unsigned int core_forceidle_occupation;
u64 core_forceidle_start;
#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+ call_single_data_t cfsb_csd;
+ struct list_head cfsb_csd_list;
+#endif
};
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
--
2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists