[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y00f5exY2fM6IwZ+@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 12:27:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v2 00/36] pinctrl: Clean up and add missed headers
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:15 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Currently the header inclusion inside the pinctrl headers seems more arbitrary
> > than logical. This series is basically out of two parts:
> > - add missed headers to the pin control drivers / users
> > - clean up the headers of pin control subsystem
> >
> > The idea is to have this series to be pulled after -rc1 by the GPIO and
> > pin control subsystems, so all new drivers will utilize cleaned up headers
> > of the pin control.
>
> Aha I see you want to send a pull request so I backed out the applied patches
> from the series for now.
Can I consider all that you answered to as Rb tag?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists