linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] RISC-V: Create unique identification for SoC PMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y01Jm6PHA1m7B1Vl@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 09:24:59 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Cc:     acme@...hat.com, linux@...ro.com, anup@...infault.org,
        n.shubin@...ro.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] RISC-V: Create unique identification for SoC PMU

Em Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:19:48AM +0300, Nikita Shubin escreveu:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 19:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Aug 2022 06:22:37 PDT (-0700), nikita.shubin@...uefel.me wrote:
> > > From: Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@...ro.com>

> > > This series aims to provide matching vendor SoC with corresponded
> > > JSON bindings.
> > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
 
> > not sure if you're looking for this via the RISC-V tree, it looks
> > like usually these get merged via a perf tree?  That's OK with me,
> > but I'm also OK taking them through the RISC-V tree.  Note that
> > cpuinfo dependency seems to be triggering kasan failures, so we'll at
> > least need to sort that out.

> As i remember correctly you were willing to take these patches into 6.0
> =).

> Well they are acked by Palmer and [2] series, which my series depends
> on, also have been accepted.

> I can resend if it helps you.

I picked it from this Message-ID with b4, applied cleanly, but yesterday
the merge window closed for v6.1, I applied it to my perf/core branch,
for v6.2.

Thanks,

- Arnaldo