| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:36:17 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] soc: renesas: Add L2 cache management for
RZ/Five SoC
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 5:40 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Guo,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 2:10 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 5:39 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> > <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Guo,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 1:59 AM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 11:03 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> > > > <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Guo,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:23 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 8:54 PM Lad, Prabhakar
> > > > > > <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Guo,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 2:29 AM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 6:32 AM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On the AX45MP core, cache coherency is a specification option so it may
> > > > > > > > > not be supported. In this case DMA will fail. As a workaround, firstly we
> > > > > > > > > allocate a global dma coherent pool from which DMA allocations are taken
> > > > > > > > > and marked as non-cacheable + bufferable using the PMA region as specified
> > > > > > > > > in the device tree. Synchronization callbacks are implemented to
> > > > > > > > > synchronize when doing DMA transactions.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Andes AX45MP core has a Programmable Physical Memory Attributes (PMA)
> > > > > > > > > block that allows dynamic adjustment of memory attributes in the runtime.
> > > > > > > > > It contains a configurable amount of PMA entries implemented as CSR
> > > > > > > > > registers to control the attributes of memory locations in interest.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Below are the memory attributes supported:
> > > > > > > > > * Device, Non-bufferable
> > > > > > > > > * Device, bufferable
> > > > > > > > > * Memory, Non-cacheable, Non-bufferable
> > > > > > > > > * Memory, Non-cacheable, Bufferable
> > > > > > > > > * Memory, Write-back, No-allocate
> > > > > > > > > * Memory, Write-back, Read-allocate
> > > > > > > > > * Memory, Write-back, Write-allocate
> > > > > > > > > * Memory, Write-back, Read and Write-allocate
> > > > > > > > Seems Svpbmt's PMA, IO, and NC wouldn't fit your requirements, could
> > > > > > > > give a map list of the types of Svpbmt? And give out what you needed,
> > > > > > > > but Svpbmt can't.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry I didn't get what you meant here, could you please elaborate.
> > > > > > I know there is no pbmt in AX45MP, I am just curious how many physical
> > > > > > memory attributes you would use in linux? It seems only one type used
> > > > > > in the series:
> > > > > > cpu_nocache_area_set -> sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_ANDES,
> > > > > > SBI_EXT_ANDES_SET_PMA, offset, vaddr, size, entry_id, 0, 0);
> > > > > >
> > > > > Yes, currently we only use "Memory, Non-cacheable, Bufferable". I was
> > > > > wondering if we could send these options as flags from DT something
> > > > > like below so that it's not hard coded in the code.
> > > > >
> > > > > /* PMA config */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP GENMASK(1, 0)
> > > > > /* OFF: PMA entry is disabled */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP_DISABLED 0
> > > > > /* Naturally aligned power of 2 region */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP_NAPOT 3
> > > > >
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP GENMASK(5, 2)
> > > > > /* Device, Non-bufferable */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_DEV_NON_BUF (0 << 2)
> > > > > /* Device, bufferable */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_DEV_BUF (1 << 2)
> > > > > /* Memory, Non-cacheable, Non-bufferable */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_NON_CACHE_NON_BUF (2 << 2)
> > > > > /* Memory, Non-cacheable, Bufferable */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_NON_CACHE_BUF (3 << 2)
> > > > > /* Memory, Write-back, No-allocate */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_WB_NA (8 << 2)
> > > > > /* Memory, Write-back, Read-allocate */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_WB_RA (9 << 2)
> > > > > /* Memory, Write-back, Write-allocate */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_WB_WA (10 << 2)
> > > > > /* Memory, Write-back, Read and Write-allocate */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_WB_R_WA (11 << 2)
> > > > >
> > > > > /* AMO instructions are supported */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_NAMO_AMO_SUPPORT (0 << 6)
> > > > > /* AMO instructions are not supported */
> > > > > #define AX45MP_PMACFG_NAMO_AMO_NO_SUPPORT (1 << 6)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > pma-regions = <0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x10000000 0x0
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP_NAPOT | AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_NON_CACHE_BUF |
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_NAMO_AMO_SUPPORT>,
> > > > > <0x0 0x10000000 0x0 0x04000000 0x0
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP_NAPOT | AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_NON_CACHE_BUF |
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_NAMO_AMO_SUPPORT >,
> > > > > <0x0 0x20000000 0x0 0x10000000 0x0
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP_NAPOT | AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_NON_CACHE_BUF |
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_NAMO_AMO_SUPPORT>,
> > > > > <0x0 0x58000000 0x0 0x08000000 0x0
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_ETYP_NAPOT | AX45MP_PMACFG_MTYP_MEM_NON_CACHE_BUF |
> > > > > AX45MP_PMACFG_NAMO_AMO_SUPPORT>;
> > > > >
> > > > > Does the above sound good?
> > > > I've no idea. But for working around, I would give Acked-by.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm not sure how you make emmc/usb/gmac's dma ctrl desc work around
> > > > > > without pbmt when they don't have cache coherency protocol. Do you
> > > > > > need to inject dma_sync for desc synchronization? What's the effect of
> > > > > > dynamic PMA in the patch series?
> > > > > >
> > > > > Currently we have setup the pma regions as below:
> > > > >
> > > > > l2cache: cache-controller@...00000 {
> > > > > compatible = "andestech,ax45mp-cache", "cache";
> > > > > cache-size = <0x40000>;
> > > > > cache-line-size = <64>;
> > > > > cache-sets = <1024>;
> > > > > cache-unified;
> > > > > reg = <0x0 0x13400000 0x0 0x100000>;
> > > > > pma-regions = <0x0 0x00000000 0x0 0x10000000 0x0 0xf>,
> > > > > <0x0 0x10000000 0x0 0x04000000 0x0 0xf>,
> > > > > <0x0 0x20000000 0x0 0x10000000 0x0 0xf>,
> > > > > <0x0 0x58000000 0x0 0x08000000 0x0 0xf>;
> > > > > interrupts = <SOC_PERIPHERAL_IRQ(476, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > The last pma-regions entry 0x58000000 is a DDR location this memory
> > > > > locations is marked as shared DMA pool with below in DT,
> > > > >
> > > > > reserved-memory {
> > > > > #address-cells = <2>;
> > > > > #size-cells = <2>;
> > > > > ranges;
> > > > >
> > > > > reserved: linux,cma@...00000 {
> > > > > compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> > > > > no-map;
> > > > > linux,dma-default;
> > > > > reg = <0x0 0x58000000 0x0 0x08000000>;
> > > > > };
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > And for ARCH_R9A07G043 we automatically select DMA_GLOBAL_POOL, so the
> > > > > IP blocks (emmc/usb/gmac's) requesting DMA'able memory will
> > > > > automatically fall into this region which is non-cacheable but
> > > > > bufferable (set in PMA) and rest everything is taken care by clean and
> > > > > flush callbacks. We dont have inject dma_sync for desc
> > > > > synchronization for existing drivers (which are shared with Renesas
> > > > > RZ/G2L family)
> > > > Better than I thought :). The "non-cacheable but c" is "weak
> > > > order," also raising the bufferable signal of AXI transactions. Right?
> > > Yes, I have confirmed from the HW team it does raise bufferable signal
> > > of AXI transactions. So far with the drivers (ETH/USB/DMAC) we haven't
> > > seen issues so far.
> > >
> > > Do you foresee any issues?
> > That depends on you interconnect design, most of the simple
> > interconnects would ignore bufferable. Some NoC interconnects would
> > buffer the transactions, which means data would be buffered in
> > interconnects after CPU store instruction retired. If the CPU kicks
> > the dma working with an IO reg write, hw may not guarantee the orders
> > of the last data written and dma IO reg kick start. Then dma may lose
> > the data.
> >
> I haven't see this issue, maybe to avoid this the controller register
> space could be marked as non-cachebale + non-bufferable in the PMA by
That sounds good, and should be. Although maybe not needed.
> this way we could ensure orders.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists