[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d9d589e-4f6c-02a4-fb00-b4467e75b47f@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 10:57:01 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
kernel@...ccoli.net, Andre Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Joshua Ashton <joshua@...ggi.es>,
Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Pierre-Loup Griffais <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Zebediah Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/split_lock: Add sysctl to control the misery mode
Thank you Bagas! I see you fixed the documentation in more than one
place, appreciate that.
What's the next step then, re-submit with your fixes, or wait more
feedback perhaps?
If a maintainer plans to pick this one, maybe they can just apply your
fix-up on top of it.
Cheers,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists