lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b75832fc-67bb-22b9-39b3-c0816b7ca254@lirui.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:03:32 +0800
From:   Rui Li <me@...ui.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
        Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] docs/zh_CN: Add userspace-api/index and ebpf
 Chinese translation

On 2022/10/17 21:52, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Rui Li <me@...ui.org> writes:
>
>> Translate the following documents into Chinese:
>>
>> - Documentation/translations/zh_CN/userspace-api/ebpf/index.rst
>> - Documentation/translations/zh_CN/userspace-api/ebpf/syscall.rst
>> - Documentation/translations/zh_CN/userspace-api/index.rst
>>
>> Add userspace-api into the menu of zh_CN index.
>>
>> Rui Li (2):
>>   docs/zh_CN: Add userspace-api/ebpf Chinese translation
>>   docs/zh_CN: Add userspace-api/index Chinese translation
>>
>>  Documentation/translations/zh_CN/index.rst    |  2 +-
>>  .../zh_CN/userspace-api/ebpf/index.rst        | 22 ++++++++
>>  .../zh_CN/userspace-api/ebpf/syscall.rst      | 31 ++++++++++++
>>  .../zh_CN/userspace-api/index.rst             | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/userspace-api/ebpf/index.rst
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/userspace-api/ebpf/syscall.rst
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/userspace-api/index.rst
> Why are you resending this patch set after one day?
>
> jon

So sorry if disturbing. After sending the first patch set, a
maintainer contacted me and pointed out my email server
is incorrectly handling DKIM and Message-Id. That causes
inconvenience for maintainers to review.

I changed my email service and hopefully the DKIM check
and Message ID won't be wrong. I am not quite sure if I
should resend or add PATCH v1 version.

Sorry again if I disturbed anyone.

Rui

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ