[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221016174033.d33a998b4c91b7d18b3dc310@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:40:33 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcov: support GCC 12.1 and newer compilers
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:30:51 +0200 Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 13.10.2022 09:40, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Starting with GCC 12.1, there are 2 significant changes to the .gcda
> > file format that needs to be supported:
> >
> > a) [gcov: Use system IO buffering] (23eb66d1d46a34cb28c4acbdf8a1deb80a7c5a05) changed
> > that all sizes in the format are in bytes and not in words (4B)
> > b) [gcov: make profile merging smarter] (72e0c742bd01f8e7e6dcca64042b9ad7e75979de)
> > add a new checksum to the file header.
> >
> > Tested with GCC 7.5, 10.4, 12.2 and the current master.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Liska <mliska@...e.cz>
>
> Looks good, thanks! I successfully tested this patch on s390 using GCC
> 12.2 and 11.2.
>
> Tested-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Andrew, could you add this patch via your tree?
Sure.
The changelog doesn't tell us what the user-visible effects of this are
(please, it should do so), but it sounds to me like those effects are
"gcov is utterly busted".
So I'll add a cc:stable to this, so that people can use new gcc
versions to build older kernels.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists