lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221018124339.115793-3-lihuafei1@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:43:39 +0800
From:   Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
To:     <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     <peterz@...radead.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>,
        <mark.rutland@....com>, <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        <jolsa@...nel.org>, <namhyung@...nel.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <arnd@...db.de>, <ardb@...nel.org>, <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        <geert+renesas@...der.be>, <nick.hawkins@....com>,
        <john@...ozen.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>, <lihuafei1@...wei.com>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <linyujun809@...wei.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: stacktrace: Convert stacktrace to generic ARCH_STACKWALK

Historically architectures have had duplicated code in their stack trace
implementations for filtering what gets traced. In order to avoid this
duplication some generic code has been provided using a new interface
arch_stack_walk(), enabled by selecting ARCH_STACKWALK in Kconfig, which
factors all this out into the generic stack trace code. Convert ARM to
use this common infrastructure.

When initializing the stack frame of the current task, arm64 uses
__builtin_frame_address(1) to initialize the frame pointer, skipping
arch_stack_walk(), see the commit c607ab4f916d ("arm64: stacktrace:
don't trace arch_stack_walk()"). Since __builtin_frame_address(1) does
not work on ARM, unwind_frame() is used to unwind the stack one layer
forward before calling walk_stackframe().

Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig             |   1 +
 arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c | 114 ++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index a08c9d092a33..16920f2215f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ config ARM
 	select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL if ARM_LPAE
 	select ARCH_HAS_SETUP_DMA_OPS
 	select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
+	select ARCH_STACKWALK
 	select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if MMU && !XIP_KERNEL
 	select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX if MMU
 	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
index d05968bc7812..620aa82e3bdd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -142,40 +142,32 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct stackframe *frame,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(walk_stackframe);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_STACKTRACE
-struct stack_trace_data {
-	struct stack_trace *trace;
-	unsigned int no_sched_functions;
-	unsigned int skip;
-};
-
-static bool save_trace(void *d, unsigned long addr)
+static void start_stack_trace(struct stackframe *frame, struct task_struct *task,
+			      unsigned long fp, unsigned long sp,
+			      unsigned long lr, unsigned long pc)
 {
-	struct stack_trace_data *data = d;
-	struct stack_trace *trace = data->trace;
-
-	if (data->no_sched_functions && in_sched_functions(addr))
-		return true;
-	if (data->skip) {
-		data->skip--;
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = addr;
-	return trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries;
+	frame->fp = fp;
+	frame->sp = sp;
+	frame->lr = lr;
+	frame->pc = pc;
+#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
+	frame->kr_cur = NULL;
+	frame->tsk = task;
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
+	frame->ex_frame = in_entry_text(frame->pc);
+#endif
 }
 
-/* This must be noinline to so that our skip calculation works correctly */
-static noinline void __save_stack_trace(struct task_struct *tsk,
-	struct stack_trace *trace, unsigned int nosched)
+void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie,
+		     struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	struct stack_trace_data data;
 	struct stackframe frame;
 
-	data.trace = trace;
-	data.skip = trace->skip;
-	data.no_sched_functions = nosched;
-
-	if (tsk != current) {
+	if (regs) {
+		start_stack_trace(&frame, NULL, regs->ARM_fp, regs->ARM_sp,
+				  regs->ARM_lr, regs->ARM_pc);
+	} else if (task != current) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 		/*
 		 * What guarantees do we have here that 'tsk' is not
@@ -184,64 +176,22 @@ static noinline void __save_stack_trace(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		 */
 		return;
 #else
-		frame.fp = thread_saved_fp(tsk);
-		frame.sp = thread_saved_sp(tsk);
-		frame.lr = 0;		/* recovered from the stack */
-		frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(tsk);
+		start_stack_trace(&frame, task, thread_saved_fp(task),
+				  thread_saved_sp(task), 0,
+				  thread_saved_pc(task));
 #endif
 	} else {
-		/* We don't want this function nor the caller */
-		data.skip += 2;
-		frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
-		frame.sp = current_stack_pointer;
-		frame.lr = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
 here:
-		frame.pc = (unsigned long)&&here;
+		start_stack_trace(&frame, task,
+				  (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
+				  current_stack_pointer,
+				  (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0),
+				  (unsigned long)&&here);
+		/* skip this function */
+		if (unwind_frame(&frame))
+			return;
 	}
-#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
-	frame.kr_cur = NULL;
-	frame.tsk = tsk;
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
-	frame.ex_frame = false;
-#endif
 
-	walk_stackframe(&frame, save_trace, &data);
-}
-
-void save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
-{
-	struct stack_trace_data data;
-	struct stackframe frame;
-
-	data.trace = trace;
-	data.skip = trace->skip;
-	data.no_sched_functions = 0;
-
-	frame.fp = regs->ARM_fp;
-	frame.sp = regs->ARM_sp;
-	frame.lr = regs->ARM_lr;
-	frame.pc = regs->ARM_pc;
-#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
-	frame.kr_cur = NULL;
-	frame.tsk = current;
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER
-	frame.ex_frame = in_entry_text(frame.pc);
-#endif
-
-	walk_stackframe(&frame, save_trace, &data);
-}
-
-void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
-{
-	__save_stack_trace(tsk, trace, 1);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(save_stack_trace_tsk);
-
-void save_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
-{
-	__save_stack_trace(current, trace, 0);
+	walk_stackframe(&frame, consume_entry, cookie);
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace);
 #endif
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ