linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v3 01/15] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: Add new DT schema for MFC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3f2f8e87-3d9e-5742-408a-17f96df6f9ca@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:09:29 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@...sung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     m.szyprowski@...sung.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
        ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
        benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org,
        dillon.minfei@...il.com, david.plowman@...pberrypi.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        andi@...zian.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
        aswani.reddy@...sung.com, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com,
        linux-fsd@...la.com, smitha.t@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 01/15] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: Add new DT schema
 for MFC

On 17/10/2022 10:16, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzk@...nel.org]
>> Sent: 12 October 2022 18:27
>> To: aakarsh jain <aakarsh.jain@...sung.com>; linux-arm-
>> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-media@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: m.szyprowski@...sung.com; andrzej.hajda@...el.com;
>> mchehab@...nel.org; hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl;
>> ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@...il.com;
>> benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com; stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org;
>> dillon.minfei@...il.com; david.plowman@...pberrypi.com;
>> mark.rutland@....com; robh+dt@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org;
>> andi@...zian.org; alim.akhtar@...sung.com; aswani.reddy@...sung.com;
>> pankaj.dubey@...sung.com; linux-fsd@...la.com; smitha.t@...sung.com
>> Subject: Re: [Patch v3 01/15] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: Add new DT
>> schema for MFC
>>
>> On 11/10/2022 08:25, aakarsh jain wrote:
>>> From: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@...sung.com>
>>>
>>> Convert DT schema for s5p-mfc in yaml format
>>
>> Convert S5P-MFC bindings to DT schema.
>>
>> You also missed full-stop.
>>
> Ok will address it in next series.
> 
>> My second comment was ignored here.
>>
> I missed one review comment which was related to change in commit message. Will address it in next series.
>>>
>>> Cc: linux-fsd@...la.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@...sung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt     |  75 --------
>>>  .../bindings/media/samsung,s5p-mfc.yaml       | 163
>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>>  2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)  create mode
>>> 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/samsung,s5p-mfc.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
>>> index aa54c8159d9f..8b137891791f 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all requested
>> changes or keep discussing them.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
> Apart from your second review comment  I guess we have addressed all your review comments in the current patch.
> Please review other changes as well and let us know if any changes required.

No, as I said you did not. Instead of bouncing back immediately, go
through previous emails and through reviews.

I already reviewed this patch and it did not apply all my comments.
Asking me to review second time is not the solution here. The solution
here is for you to go through the comments and implement them, or answer
and keep discussion going.

Best regards,
Krzysztof