[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y064vNAcOCSAimUT@alley>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:31:24 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: yexingchen116@...il.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] vsprintf: replace in_irq() with in_hardirq()
On Tue 2022-10-11 11:02:38, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2022-10-11 02:48:31, yexingchen116@...il.com wrote:
> > From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> >
> > Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
> > macro in_hardirq().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
>
> I am going to queue it for 6.2. I would push it for 6.1 only together
> with another important changes. This one is not worth pull request
> at this stage.
JFYI, the patch is committed in printk/linux.git, branch for-6.2.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists