linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] lib/cpumask: add FORCE_NR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 07:59:22 -0700
From:   Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>,
        Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@...il.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] lib/cpumask: add FORCE_NR_CPUS config option

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 05:44:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 07:35:09AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 03:50:31PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > For those who choose FORCE_NR_CPUS, it's required to set NR_CPUS
> > to a value that matches to what's parsed from DT.
> > 
> > Can you please look at the draft below that disables FORCE_NR_CPUS
> > in allmodconfig? If it's OK with you, I'll send a patch. If you think
> > that there are architectures where it's not possible to set correct
> > NR_CPUS at compile time for some reason, I'll add ARCH_UNFORCE_NR_CPUS
> > option.
> 
> Instead you may simply add
> 
> 	depends on CONFIG_$ARCH/$MACHINE=n
> 
> and so on to the FORCE_NR_CPUS, no?

Yes, if there's just one machine like that. If there's many of them, the
'depends' list would be too long.

I hope there's no such a weird machines, and we don't need that at
all. Let's see what Geert will say.