[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y07LCnJN5q8ueV7X@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:49:30 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org, ebiggers@...nel.org,
paolo.valente@...aro.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] blk-wbt: don't show valid wbt_lat_usec in sysfs
while wbt is disabled
> static ssize_t queue_wb_lat_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
> {
> + u64 lat;
> +
> if (!wbt_rq_qos(q))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", div_u64(wbt_get_min_lat(q), 1000));
> + lat = wbt_disabled(q) ? 0 : div_u64(wbt_get_min_lat(q), 1000);
> +
> + return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", lat);
if (wbt_disabled(q))
return sprintf(page, "0\n");
return sprintf(page, "%llu\n", div_u64(wbt_get_min_lat(q), 1000));
but otherwise the patch looks fine:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists