[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y07OcqPNjSihOByt@elroy-temp-vm.gaiao0uenmiufjlowqgp5yxwdh.gvxx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:04:02 +0000
From: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: rts5208: Replace instances of udelay by
usleep_range
Replace the use of udelay by usleep_range as suggested by checkpatch:
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
+ udelay(30);
CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
+ udelay(50);
Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@...il.com>
---
v2: changed the max values of the usleep_rage instances as they cannot
be equal to the min values as suggested by checkpatch
drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
index 14449f8afad5..a9724ca5eccf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/ms.c
@@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int ms_write_multiple_pages(struct rtsx_chip *chip, u16 old_blk,
return STATUS_FAIL;
}
- udelay(30);
+ usleep_range(30, 31);
rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
@@ -4157,7 +4157,7 @@ int mg_set_ICV(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip)
#ifdef MG_SET_ICV_SLOW
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
- udelay(50);
+ usleep_range(50, 51);
rtsx_init_cmd(chip);
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists