[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221018183813.GW5600@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:38:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:41:52AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/loongarch/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> c78c43fe7d42 ("LoongArch: Use acpi_arch_dma_setup() and remove ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 839fc1e464eb ("arch/loongarch: Add ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS Kconfig option")
>
> from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thank you, Stephen!
For whatever it is worth, this will go away once I test my rebase to v6.1.
Thanx, Paul
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 903096bd87f8,c8864768dc4d..000000000000
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@@ -10,6 -10,8 +10,7 @@@ config LOONGARC
> select ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> select ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> select ARCH_HAS_ACPI_TABLE_UPGRADE if ACPI
> + select ARCH_HAS_NMI_SAFE_THIS_CPU_OPS
> - select ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA
> select ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL
> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> select ARCH_INLINE_READ_LOCK if !PREEMPTION
Powered by blists - more mailing lists