[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c561dd8ec384bfc77998a6db6ed824e7@overdrivepizza.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 13:17:28 -0700
From: Joao Moreira <joao@...rdrivepizza.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ibt: Implement FineIBT
>
>> Tangent: why are these nop instead of 0xcc? These bytes aren't
>> executed
>> ever are they?
>
> Because that's what the compiler gets us through
> -fpatchable-function-entry.
Is it useful to get the compiler to emit 0xcc with
-fpatchable-function-entry under any circumstance? I can probably change
that quickly if needed/useful.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists