[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221018210447.sg3tddaujre6orgc@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 17:04:47 -0400
From: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
To: Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@...ras.ru>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] x86_64: Improvements at compressed kernel stage
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:41:04PM +0300, Evgeniy Baskov wrote:
> This patchset is aimed
> * to improve UEFI compatibility of compressed kernel code for x86_64
> * to setup proper memory access attributes for code and rodata sections
> * to implement W^X protection policy throughout the whole execution
> of compressed kernel for EFISTUB code path.
Hi Evgeniy,
I've tested this set of patches with the Mu firmware that supports the W^X
feature and a modified bootloader to also support it, and also with an
existing firmware and the grub2 build in fedora 36. On the firmware
without W^X support, this all works for me. With W^X support, it works
so long as I use CONFIG_EFI_STUB_EXTRACT_DIRECT, though I still need
some changes in grub's loader. IMO that's a big step forward.
I can't currently make it work with W^X enabled but without direct
extraction, and I'm still investigating why not, but I figured I'd give
you a heads up.
--
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists