Message-Id: <20221018233601.282381-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:36:01 -0700
From:   Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@...cle.com>,
        James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Ray Fucillo <Ray.Fucillo@...ersystems.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix memory leak associated with vma_lock structure

The hugetlb vma_lock structure hangs off the vm_private_data pointer
of sharable hugetlb vmas.  The structure is vma specific and can not
be shared between vmas.  At fork and various other times, vmas are
duplicated via vm_area_dup().  When this happens, the pointer in the
newly created vma must be cleared and the structure reallocated.  Two
hugetlb specific routines deal with this hugetlb_dup_vma_private and
hugetlb_vm_op_open.  Both routines are called for newly created vmas.
hugetlb_dup_vma_private would always clear the pointer and
hugetlb_vm_op_open would allocate the new vms_lock structure.  This did
not work in the case of this calling sequence pointed out in [1].
  move_vma
    copy_vma
      new_vma = vm_area_dup(vma);
      new_vma->vm_ops->open(new_vma); --> new_vma has its own vma lock.
    is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)
      clear_vma_resv_huge_pages
        hugetlb_dup_vma_private --> vma->vm_private_data is set to NULL
When clearing hugetlb_dup_vma_private we actually leak the associated
vma_lock structure.

The vma_lock structure contains a pointer to the associated vma.  This
information can be used in hugetlb_dup_vma_private and hugetlb_vm_op_open
to ensure we only clear the vm_private_data of newly created (copied)
vmas.  In such cases, the vma->vma_lock->vma field will not point to the
vma.

Update hugetlb_dup_vma_private and hugetlb_vm_op_open to not clear
vm_private_data if vma->vma_lock->vma == vma.  Also, log a warning if
hugetlb_vm_op_open ever encounters the case where vma_lock has already
been correctly allocated for the vma.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/5154292a-4c55-28cd-0935-82441e512fc3@huawei.com/

Fixes: 131a79b474e9 ("hugetlb: fix vma lock handling during split vma and range unmapping")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 02f781624fce..7f74cbff6619 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1014,15 +1014,23 @@ void hugetlb_dup_vma_private(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	VM_BUG_ON_VMA(!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma), vma);
 	/*
 	 * Clear vm_private_data
+	 * - For shared mappings this is a per-vma semaphore that may be
+	 *   allocated in a subsequent call to hugetlb_vm_op_open.
+	 *   Before clearing, make sure pointer is not associated with vma
+	 *   as this will leak the structure.  This is the case when called
+	 *   via clear_vma_resv_huge_pages() and hugetlb_vm_op_open has already
+	 *   been called to allocate a new structure.
 	 * - For MAP_PRIVATE mappings, this is the reserve map which does
 	 *   not apply to children.  Faults generated by the children are
 	 *   not guaranteed to succeed, even if read-only.
-	 * - For shared mappings this is a per-vma semaphore that may be
-	 *   allocated in a subsequent call to hugetlb_vm_op_open.
 	 */
-	vma->vm_private_data = (void *)0;
-	if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE))
-		return;
+	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE) {
+		struct hugetlb_vma_lock *vma_lock = vma->vm_private_data;
+
+		if (vma_lock && vma_lock->vma != vma)
+			vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
+	} else
+		vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -4601,6 +4609,7 @@ static void hugetlb_vm_op_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	struct resv_map *resv = vma_resv_map(vma);
 
 	/*
+	 * HPAGE_RESV_OWNER indicates a private mapping.
 	 * This new VMA should share its siblings reservation map if present.
 	 * The VMA will only ever have a valid reservation map pointer where
 	 * it is being copied for another still existing VMA.  As that VMA
@@ -4616,10 +4625,18 @@ static void hugetlb_vm_op_open(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	/*
 	 * vma_lock structure for sharable mappings is vma specific.
 	 * Clear old pointer (if copied via vm_area_dup) and create new.
+	 * Before clearing, make sure vma_lock is not for this vma.
 	 */
 	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE) {
-		vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
-		hugetlb_vma_lock_alloc(vma);
+		struct hugetlb_vma_lock *vma_lock = vma->vm_private_data;
+
+		if (vma_lock) {
+			if (vma_lock->vma != vma) {
+				vma->vm_private_data = NULL;
+				hugetlb_vma_lock_alloc(vma);
+			} else
+				pr_warn("HugeTLB: vma_lock already exists in %s.\n", __func__);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.37.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists