[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221018020227.85905-11-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:02:17 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/20] perf stat: Factor out evsel__count_has_error()
It's possible to have 0 enabled/running time for some per-task or per-cgroup
events since it's not scheduled on any CPU. Treating the whole event as
failed would not work in this case. Thinking again, the code only existed
when any CPU-level aggregation is enabled (like per-socket, per-core, ...).
To make it clearer, factor out the condition check into the new
evsel__count_has_error() function and add some comments.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/util/stat.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
index 99874254809d..dc075d5a0f72 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
@@ -381,6 +381,25 @@ static int check_per_pkg(struct evsel *counter, struct perf_counts_values *vals,
return ret;
}
+static bool evsel__count_has_error(struct evsel *evsel,
+ struct perf_counts_values *count,
+ struct perf_stat_config *config)
+{
+ /* the evsel was failed already */
+ if (evsel->err || evsel->counts->scaled == -1)
+ return true;
+
+ /* this is meaningful for CPU aggregation modes only */
+ if (config->aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL)
+ return false;
+
+ /* it's considered ok when it actually ran */
+ if (count->ena != 0 && count->run != 0)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int
process_counter_values(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct evsel *evsel,
int cpu_map_idx, int thread,
@@ -420,8 +439,7 @@ process_counter_values(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct evsel *evsel,
* When any result is bad, make them all to give
* consistent output in interval mode.
*/
- if (count->ena == 0 || count->run == 0 ||
- evsel->counts->scaled == -1) {
+ if (evsel__count_has_error(evsel, count, config) && !ps_aggr->failed) {
ps_aggr->counts.val = 0;
ps_aggr->counts.ena = 0;
ps_aggr->counts.run = 0;
--
2.38.0.413.g74048e4d9e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists