linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: add samsung,starqltechn board based on sdm845 chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cef4dea2-9892-971f-5dbc-62eaac478d62@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:04:04 -0400
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: add samsung,starqltechn board
 based on sdm845 chip

On 17/10/2022 04:02, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
>>> I've been told it's easier for maintainers to resend all patch series,
>>> even if only 1 patch from the series requires change. So I decided to
>>> keep versions equal in all patches, to clearly indicate those patches
>>> are from the same series. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> This is okay, but you wrote here there was a v1 and v2, and you changed
>> nothing against it. If there was v1 and v2, we would ack it, I think.
>>
>> Or this changelog is for some other patch? Not for this one?
> There's no previous versions of this patch, since it was born in the
> v3 patch series. The empty changelog for this patch indicates that
> there's no point to look for previous versions. I think I'll do it
> differently next time to avoid confusion - just a sentence that vN is
> the start version for patch.

Yes, please. Something like:

Changes for v3: New patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof