[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221018040454.405719-4-gshan@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 12:04:51 +0800
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, maz@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev, mail@...iej.szmigiero.name,
maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, peterx@...hat.com,
ricarkol@...gle.com, zhenyzha@...hat.com, shan.gavin@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once
prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory
slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not
free and unnecessary.
Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args()
for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm().
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 32 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
index dcb492b3f27b..f0ea3f75b6e1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c
@@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots,
void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages,
struct timespec *slot_runtime)
{
- uint32_t max_mem_slots;
uint64_t rempages;
uint64_t guest_addr;
uint32_t slot;
struct timespec tstart;
struct sync_area *sync;
- max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
- TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1,
- "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1");
- TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1,
- "Slot count cap should be greater than 1");
- if (nslots != -1)
- max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots);
- pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots);
-
TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1,
"Can't test without any memory");
data->npages = mempages;
- data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1;
+ data->nslots = nslots;
data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots;
if (!data->pages_per_slot) {
*maxslots = mempages + 1;
@@ -869,6 +859,7 @@ static void help(char *name, struct test_args *targs)
static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
struct test_args *targs)
{
+ uint32_t max_mem_slots;
int opt;
while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "hvds:f:e:l:r:")) != -1) {
@@ -885,8 +876,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
break;
case 's':
targs->nslots = atoi(optarg);
- if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) {
- pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n");
+ if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) {
+ pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n");
return false;
}
break;
@@ -932,6 +923,21 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[],
return false;
}
+ max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
+ if (max_mem_slots <= 1) {
+ pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Memory slot 0 is reserved */
+ if (targs->nslots == -1)
+ targs->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1;
+ else
+ targs->nslots = min_t(int, targs->nslots, max_mem_slots) - 1;
+
+ pr_info_v("Allowed Number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n",
+ targs->nslots + 1);
+
return true;
}
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists