[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y05Hmmz1jKzk3dfk@shredder>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:28:42 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, vadimp@...dia.com
Cc: rafael@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"open list:MELLANOX ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/drivers/mellanox: Use generic
thermal_zone_get_trip() function
+ Vadim
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:32:51AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The thermal framework gives the possibility to register the trip
> points with the thermal zone. When that is done, no get_trip_* ops are
> needed and they can be removed.
>
> Convert ops content logic into generic trip points and register them with the
> thermal zone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Vadim, can you please review and test?
Daniel, I saw that you wrote to Kalle that you want to take it via the
thermal tree. Any reason not to take it via net-next? I'm asking because
it will be the second release in a row where we need to try to avoid
conflicts in this file.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists