[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ec14007-affc-f826-6dda-f23ee166226a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 10:16:20 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] kbuild: remove head-y syntax
Hi,
On 24. 09. 22, 20:19, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Kbuild puts the objects listed in head-y at the head of vmlinux.
> Conventionally, we do this for head*.S, which contains the kernel entry
> point.
>
> A counter approach is to control the section order by the linker script.
> Actually, the code marked as __HEAD goes into the ".head.text" section,
> which is placed before the normal ".text" section.
>
> I do not know if both of them are needed. From the build system
> perspective, head-y is not mandatory. If you can achieve the proper code
> placement by the linker script only, it would be cleaner.
>
> I collected the current head-y objects into head-object-list.txt. It is
> a whitelist. My hope is it will be reduced in the long run.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
...
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1149,10 +1149,10 @@ quiet_cmd_ar_vmlinux.a = AR $@
> cmd_ar_vmlinux.a = \
> rm -f $@; \
> $(AR) cDPrST $@ $(KBUILD_VMLINUX_OBJS); \
> - $(AR) mPiT $$($(AR) t $@ | head -n1) $@ $(head-y)
> + $(AR) mPiT $$($(AR) t $@ | head -n1) $@ $$($(AR) t $@ | grep -F --file=$(srctree)/scripts/head-object-list.txt)
With AR=gcc-ar, the "| head -n1" results in:
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/7/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ar
terminated with signal 13 [Broken pipe]
I found out only with gcc-lto. But maybe we should make it silent in any
case? I'm not sure how. This looks ugly (and needs the whole output to
be piped):
gcc-ar t vmlinux.a | ( head -n1; cat >/dev/null )
Note the result appears to be correct, it's only that gcc-ar complains
after printing out the very first line.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists