[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8735blsez4.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:39:11 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>,
Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] memory tier, sysfs: rename attribute "nodes" to "nodes_list"
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com> writes:
> How about "nodelist", instead of "nodes_list"? It is more concise and
> follows the convention of:
>
> /sys/devices/system/nodes/node0/cpulist
Sounds good to me.
It seems that cpumap/cpulist is another pair of mask/list.
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpumap
/sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_map
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index1/shared_cpu_list
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:26 PM Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> In sysfs, we use attribute name "cpus" for cpu mask and "cpus_list"
>> for cpu list. For example, in my system,
>>
>> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology/core_cpus
>> 0,00100004
>> $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology/core_cpus_list
>> 2,20
>>
>> It looks reasonable to use "nodes" for node mask and "nodes_list" for
>> node list. So, rename the attribute to follow the naming convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>
>> Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>
>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
>> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
>> Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@...wei.com>
>> Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@...il.com>
>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
>> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>
>> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers | 4 ++--
>> mm/memory-tiers.c | 8 ++++----
>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers
>> index 45985e411f13..af07e166f559 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-kernel-mm-memory-tiers
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Description: A collection of all the memory tiers allocated.
>>
>>
>> What: /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/
>> - /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/nodes
>> + /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/nodes_list
>> Date: August 2022
>> Contact: Linux memory management mailing list <linux-mm@...ck.org>
>> Description: Directory with details of a specific memory tier
>> @@ -21,5 +21,5 @@ Description: Directory with details of a specific memory tier
>> A smaller value of N implies a higher (faster) memory tier in the
>> hierarchy.
>>
>> - nodes: NUMA nodes that are part of this memory tier.
>> + nodes_list: NUMA nodes that are part of this memory tier.
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
>> index f116b7b6333e..8dbfe9ec87d5 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
>> @@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static void memory_tier_device_release(struct device *dev)
>> kfree(tier);
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t nodes_show(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t nodes_list_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> nodemask_t nmask;
>> @@ -143,10 +143,10 @@ static ssize_t nodes_show(struct device *dev,
>> mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(nodes);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(nodes_list);
>>
>> static struct attribute *memtier_dev_attrs[] = {
>> - &dev_attr_nodes.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_nodes_list.attr,
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists