linux-kernel - [PATCHv10 08/15] x86/mm: Reduce untagged_addr() overhead until the first LAM user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221018113358.7833-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 14:33:51 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv10 08/15] x86/mm: Reduce untagged_addr() overhead until the first LAM user

Use static key to reduce untagged_addr() overhead.

The key only gets enabled when the first process enables LAM.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 8 ++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c   | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c6062c07ccd2..820234f1f750 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(tagged_addr_key);
+
 /*
  * Mask out tag bits from the address.
  *
@@ -31,8 +33,10 @@ static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void);
  */
 #define untagged_addr(mm, addr)	({					\
 	u64 __addr = (__force u64)(addr);				\
-	s64 sign = (s64)__addr >> 63;					\
-	__addr &= (mm)->context.untag_mask | sign;			\
+	if (static_branch_likely(&tagged_addr_key)) {			\
+		s64 sign = (s64)__addr >> 63;				\
+		__addr &= (mm)->context.untag_mask | sign;		\
+	}								\
 	(__force __typeof__(addr))__addr;				\
 })
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index a98536101447..9952e9f517ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -743,6 +743,9 @@ static long prctl_map_vdso(const struct vdso_image *image, unsigned long addr)
 }
 #endif
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(tagged_addr_key);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tagged_addr_key);
+
 static void enable_lam_func(void *mm)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *loaded_mm = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
@@ -792,6 +795,7 @@ static int prctl_enable_tagged_addr(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_bits)
 	}
 
 	on_each_cpu_mask(mm_cpumask(mm), enable_lam_func, mm, true);
+	static_branch_enable(&tagged_addr_key);
 out:
 	mmap_write_unlock(mm);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.38.0