[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y06RCxzwrPZwIETp@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 12:42:03 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] spi: pxa2xx: Remove no more needed PCI ID table
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 08:41:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:39:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Which board code is this? The names of the new properties you're adding
> > is really not at all idiomatic for ACPI and this is pretty old code so
> > it's surprising that there's not existing systems that don't have this
> > in their BIOSs.
> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c.
OK, so this is another push for device properties for passing stuff
internally. Please resubmit this series with descriptions of why this
is being done - I really can't tell what the benefit is here in concrete
terms, you say it somehow improves identification of which variant is in
use but don't articulate specifically why.
You should probably also restructure the code interpreting the device
IDs so that it's very clear that unknown values are handled well, this
would split things between multiple subsystems and right now the code is
a bit fragile.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists