[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221018121932.10792-3-shikemeng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 20:19:29 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
To: <tj@...nel.org>, <josef@...icpanda.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <shikemeng@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] blk-iocost: Reset vtime_base_rate in ioc_refresh_params
Since commit ac33e91e2daca("blk-iocost: implement vtime loss compensation")
split vtime_rate into vtime_rate and vtime_base_rate, we need reset both
vtime_base_rate and vtime_rate when device parameters are refreshed.
If vtime_base_rate is no reset here, vtime_rate will be overwritten with
old vtime_base_rate soon in ioc_refresh_vrate.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
block/blk-iocost.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index be4bc38821e2..9214733bbc14 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -906,8 +906,10 @@ static bool ioc_refresh_params(struct ioc *ioc, bool force)
if (idx == ioc->autop_idx && !force)
return false;
- if (idx != ioc->autop_idx)
+ if (idx != ioc->autop_idx) {
atomic64_set(&ioc->vtime_rate, VTIME_PER_USEC);
+ ioc->vtime_base_rate = VTIME_PER_USEC;
+ }
ioc->autop_idx = idx;
ioc->autop_too_fast_at = 0;
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists