lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y0/nEngJF6bbINEx@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 19 Oct 2022 05:01:22 -0700
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] kallsyms: Optimizes the performance of lookup
 symbols

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 02:49:39PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Currently, to search for a symbol, we need to expand the symbols in
> 'kallsyms_names' one by one, and then use the expanded string for
> comparison. This is very slow.
> 
> In fact, we can first compress the name being looked up and then use
> it for comparison when traversing 'kallsyms_names'.
> 
> This patch series optimizes the performance of function kallsyms_lookup_name(),
> and function klp_find_object_symbol() in the livepatch module. Based on the
> test results, the performance overhead is reduced to 5%. That is, the
> performance of these functions is improved by 20 times.

Stupid question, is a hash table in order?

  Luis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ