| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2045deec-09a5-c696-dee1-f2c7457fbb18@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 12:35:37 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <heiko@...ech.de>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
CC: <atishp@...shpatra.org>, <anup@...infault.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ajones@...tanamicro.com>, <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] RISC-V: Fix compilation without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
On 19/10/2022 13:30, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Hi Anup,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2022, 14:16:19 CEST schrieb Anup Patel:
>> From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>>
>> riscv_cbom_block_size and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always
>> be available and riscv_init_cbom_blocksize() should always be
>> invoked, even when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM enabled. This
>> is because disabling RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM means "don't use zicbom
>> instructions in the kernel" not "pretend there isn't zicbom, even
>> when there is". When zicbom is available, whether the kernel enables
>> its use with RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM or not, KVM will offer it to guests.
>> Ensure we can build KVM and that the block size is initialized even
>> when compiling without RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM.
>
> either I'm way very low on coffee or something is strange here :-) .
>
> I can fully grasp the need to init the cbom blocksize for guests, even when
> the main kernel isn't using it, but below in the patch itself it is still:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
> +{
> [...]
>
> so the init_cbom_blocksize function is still inside a RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
> ifdef?
FWIW:
Drew's patch, or at least the version of it that I have been using/did
a review of, does not have init_cbom_blocksize() inside such a #ifdef.
>
>
> Heiko
>
>
>>
>> Fixes: 8f7e001e0325 ("RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probing")
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 41 ---------------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
>> index 6cb7d96ad9c7..f318b2553612 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c
>> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
>> * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> @@ -86,3 +88,42 @@ void flush_icache_pte(pte_t pte)
>> flush_icache_all();
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
>> +
>> +unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
>> +void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node;
>> + unsigned long cbom_hartid;
>> + u32 val, probed_block_size;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + probed_block_size = 0;
>> + for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
>> + unsigned long hartid;
>> +
>> + ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
>> + if (ret)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (!probed_block_size) {
>> + probed_block_size = val;
>> + cbom_hartid = hartid;
>> + } else {
>> + if (probed_block_size != val)
>> + pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
>> + cbom_hartid, hartid);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (probed_block_size)
>> + riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> index b0add983530a..d919efab6eba 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> @@ -8,13 +8,8 @@
>> #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
>> #include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> -#include <linux/of.h>
>> -#include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>>
>> -unsigned int riscv_cbom_block_size;
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_cbom_block_size);
>> -
>> static bool noncoherent_supported;
>>
>> void arch_sync_dma_for_device(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
>> @@ -77,42 +72,6 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size,
>> dev->dma_coherent = coherent;
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM
>> -void riscv_init_cbom_blocksize(void)
>> -{
>> - struct device_node *node;
>> - unsigned long cbom_hartid;
>> - u32 val, probed_block_size;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - probed_block_size = 0;
>> - for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
>> - unsigned long hartid;
>> -
>> - ret = riscv_of_processor_hartid(node, &hartid);
>> - if (ret)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - /* set block-size for cbom extension if available */
>> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "riscv,cbom-block-size", &val);
>> - if (ret)
>> - continue;
>> -
>> - if (!probed_block_size) {
>> - probed_block_size = val;
>> - cbom_hartid = hartid;
>> - } else {
>> - if (probed_block_size != val)
>> - pr_warn("cbom-block-size mismatched between harts %lu and %lu\n",
>> - cbom_hartid, hartid);
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (probed_block_size)
>> - riscv_cbom_block_size = probed_block_size;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>> -
>> void riscv_noncoherent_supported(void)
>> {
>> WARN(!riscv_cbom_block_size,
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists