[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221019093825.339991-1-wuhoipok@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:38:25 +0800
From: Hoi Pok Wu <wuhoipok@...il.com>
To: shaggy@...nel.org
Cc: Hoi Pok Wu <wuhoipok@...il.com>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+f0e0fcf3cd1047ae60ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] fs: jfs: fix shift-out-of-bounds in dbDiscardAG
Bug reported by syzbot, UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in dbDiscardAG.
Fixed by simply rearranging agno_end smaller than MAXAG. However, I wonder if it
is a better idea to return -EINVAL, rejecting user input. Thank you.
Reported-by: syzbot+f0e0fcf3cd1047ae60ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Hoi Pok Wu <wuhoipok@...il.com>
---
fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c
index 575cb2ba74fc..3101eaf3098a 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_discard.c
@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ int jfs_ioc_trim(struct inode *ip, struct fstrim_range *range)
*/
agno = BLKTOAG(start, JFS_SBI(ip->i_sb));
agno_end = BLKTOAG(end, JFS_SBI(ip->i_sb));
+
+ if (agno_end >= MAXAG)
+ agno_end = MAXAG - 1;
+
while (agno <= agno_end) {
trimmed += dbDiscardAG(ip, agno, minlen);
agno++;
--
2.38.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists